Holocaust Censorship Singlehandedly Disproves the Holocaust

The Holocaust is so clearly a lie.

The most obvious reason is because it’s socially forbidden (and even illegal in some countries) to call it a lie.

That means it’s a lie.

Nobody criminalizes the questioning of a claim unless that claim is a lie. If a claim is true, you don’t need to forbid scrutiny of it, because you can prove it – because it’s true. You only rely on brute force to uphold belief in the claim if the claim is not true – because brute force is all you have – because you have no reasoning – because there is none – because the claim is a lie.

If someone is attempting to enforce belief in a claim by enacting punishments upon those who dispute it, then you can safely assume that the belief they’re enforcing is bullshit. The only reason they’re using force to uphold it is because force is all they have – because their claim cannot be upheld with logic – rather, it’s easily debunked by logic – and the only way to beat that logic is to prevent people from hearing it in the first place – to intercept it on its way to its audience, and prevent it from reaching their eyes and ears.

If you use censorship to enforce belief in a claim, then your winning of the debate depends fundamentally on your audience’s ignorance. You depend on the audience not knowing something, and remaining unaware of it for the entirety of the discussion. And when you depend on others’ ignorance, when you need others to remain ignorant, this is a clear signal that you’re on the wrong side of things.

The Holocaust narrative relies on ignorance. Its primary strategy for perpetuating itself is your unawareness of the existence of the arguments against it. It doesn’t refute those arguments; rather, it prevents you from knowing that they exist.

And it does this right out in the open.

The Holocaust narrative withstands its critics not by debunking their arguments, but by making sure you can’t hear them.

The Holocaust narrative depends not upon communication, but upon the prevention of communication. For communication shines light upon it, and in doing so, destroys it. Communication destroys the Holocaust narrative, and so the story’s purveyors block communication. They block you from hearing what their opponents have to say. They prevent you from even knowing what the arguments are that you’re supposed to dismiss. They expect you to preemptively reject arguments you haven’t even learned yet. They expect you to rate a movie you haven’t watched; and then if you refuse to rate it, they intimidate you into rating it, by threatening you with fear of social repercussions for not rating it. They compel you into committing an ongoing epistemic offense. They coerce you into gaslighting yourself. Their enforcement of their narrative requires your Orwellian humiliation.

By blocking your ears, or by covering the mouths of those who would speak to you, they are admitting that they have no logic to stand on. They’re admitting that, in the arena of logic, they would fail. If someone says, “Don’t you dare listen to that guy!”, then you can rest assured that “that guy” has an argument that would demolish the censorious coward instantly.

***

So, since the Holocaust narrative is the most vicious and pervasive censorship regime in all of human history, you can assume there’s a reason for that: Its purveyors do not believe they can win the argument on its merits. They know their case is hollow. If they shrink from debate, you know that 5 minutes of logical scrutiny would likely render their whole story transparently irrational – and that’s why they have to run from it, and externally sabotage all attempts by others to hash it out, and intimidate others into staying silent out of fear.

It’s the most obvious thing in the world, if you bother to think about it.

And not only is the Holocaust narrative the biggest, baddest censorship regime, but it’s also the first – the original – the tip of the spear that made the inaugural puncture wound into modern Freedom of Speech in the western world. The Holocaust was the narrative that convinced Americans, Europeans, and the entire West, to surrender their free speech. The first censorship that the modern western world consented to en masse, was the censorship of “Holocaust denial.” That was when the West invited the vampire into its house.

Whatever topic you’re upset at the censoring of – whether it’s vaccine and covid skepticism, natural medicine, transgender ideology and groomer agendas, 2020 Election fraud, climate-change skepticism, WEF and digital currency awareness, 9/11 truth, Ukraine truth, Israeli war crimes – whatever “your” censored topic is, you should know that the original precedent, the original vampire that the West invited to enter its house, was the censorship of “Holocaust denial.”

Even today, the purveyors of censorship (of all topics) will fall back on one final “Ace-up-the-Sleeve” argument when cornered, and it sounds like this:

“If you think free speech should be absolute, then what about Holocaust deniers? Would you let THEM speak? Are you ok with NEO NAZIS speaking? HA! I cornered YOU now!”

And then you, the free speech advocate, have to start hemming and hawing and waffling around, trying to find a middle ground, while your opponent wields the sword of absolute ironclad self-righteousness over you, and looks far more authoritative in comparison to you – and thus wins the argument on the emotional plane, which is far more lasting and durable, in more people, than winning it on the logical plane.

The only way to break through this web is by saying “Yes, because that one’s bullshit too.”

“Yes, Holocaust-narrative scrutiny should indeed be allowed, because the Holocaust narrative is bullshit too, and you’re a dupe for believing in it. The fact that you rely on censorship, intimidation, and your audience’s ignorance of the arguments of your opponents, proves that you fear those arguments, because they demolish your stupid story. The censorship itself is the giveaway. It’s obvious. The Holocaust story, as you weave it, is a lie.”

Now THAT is a sword of righteousness, far sturdier and stronger than their petty name-calling.

And in order to wield that sword, you’ll need to learn the specifics of why the holocaust narrative is irrational, and be able to spot the holes in it, and the junctures where the logic breaks down.

Only then – only when you’ve expelled the original vampire at the foundation of the modern censorship regime – only then can you repel the final attack of the censorious, and win a true victory for freedom of speech.